Kam Jones vs Mike Conley

Mike Conley scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (4.5 vs 4.4), on Jones's heavier usage (14.1% vs 11.3%).

Conley is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 51.7% to 47.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Jones (3.2 vs 2.9 assists), the glass to Conley (1.7 vs 1.6 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Conley played 17 more games (54 vs 37 of 82).

With Conley on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.2 per 100 possessions, against -10.0 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Jones — through —, Conley $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.