Jase Richardson vs Kam Jones

Kam Jones scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (4.4 vs 4.4), on Richardson's heavier usage (16.2% vs 14.1%).

Richardson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.4% to 47.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Jones (3.2 vs 1.1 assists), the glass to Jones (1.6 vs 1.2 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Richardson played 17 more games (54 vs 37 of 82).

With Richardson on the floor his team outscored opponents by -0.8 per 100 possessions, against -10.0 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Richardson $3.1M through 2028-29, Jones — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.