Jase Richardson vs Mike Conley

Mike Conley scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (4.5 vs 4.4), on Richardson's heavier usage (16.2% vs 11.3%).

Richardson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.4% to 51.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Conley (2.9 vs 1.1 assists), the glass to Conley (1.7 vs 1.2 rebounds).

With Conley on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.2 per 100 possessions, against -0.8 for Richardson; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Richardson $3.1M through 2028-29, Conley $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.