Hugo Gonzalez vs Noah Penda
Gonzalez · Penda
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveHugo Gonzalez scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (3.9 vs 3.8), on Penda's heavier usage (14.0% vs 11.4%).
Gonzalez is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 56.1% to 50.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Penda (1.2 vs 0.5 assists), the glass to Gonzalez (3.3 vs 3.2 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Gonzalez played 15 more games (74 vs 59 of 82).
With Gonzalez on the floor his team outscored opponents by +11.9 per 100 possessions, against -3.0 for Penda; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Gonzalez $2.9M through 2028-29, Penda $2.2M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

