Javonte Green vs Tyrese Proctor
Green · Proctor
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTyrese Proctor scored more in 2026-27, 0.0 points a game apart (6.0 vs 6.0), on Proctor's heavier usage (12.9% vs 12.7%).
Proctor is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 64.8% to 56.2%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Proctor (2.1 vs 0.5 assists), the glass to Proctor (3.0 vs 2.6 rebounds).
With Green on the floor his team outscored opponents by +22.5 per 100 possessions, against +8.5 for Proctor; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Green $3.9M through 2026-27, Proctor $2.2M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2026-27 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2026-27 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

