Josh Green vs LJ Cryer
Green · Cryer
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJosh Green scored more in 2026-27, 0.4 points a game apart (3.0 vs 2.6), on Cryer's heavier usage (22.2% vs 8.5%).
Cryer is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 53.3% to 49.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Cryer (1.0 vs 0.7 assists), the glass to Green (1.6 vs 0.3 rebounds).
With Green on the floor his team outscored opponents by +5.8 per 100 possessions, against -20.9 for Cryer; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Green $14.7M through 2026-27, Cryer — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2026-27 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2026-27 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
