Josh Green vs Kam Jones

Kam Jones scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (4.4 vs 4.3), on Jones's heavier usage (14.1% vs 10.4%).

Green is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 64.4% to 47.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Jones (3.2 vs 0.8 assists), the glass to Green (1.8 vs 1.6 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Green played 21 more games (58 vs 37 of 82).

With Green on the floor his team outscored opponents by +12.5 per 100 possessions, against -10.0 for Jones; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Green $14.7M through 2026-27, Jones — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.