Cam Christie vs Mark Sears

Mark Sears scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (3.1 vs 2.8), on Sears's heavier usage (34.4% vs 16.8%).

Sears is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 66.6% to 48.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Christie (0.6 vs 0.3 assists), the glass to Christie (1.4 vs 0.3 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Christie played 48 more games (55 vs 7 of 82).

With Sears on the floor his team outscored opponents by +21.4 per 100 possessions, against -0.6 for Christie; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Christie $2.3M through 2027-28, Sears — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.