Alperen Sengun vs LaMelo Ball
Sengun · Ball
| Sengun | Ball | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Games availability | 72 |
| 33.3 | Minutes per game | 28.0 |
| 20.4 | Points per game | 20.1 |
| 8.9 | Rebounds per game | 4.8 |
| 6.2 | Assists per game | 7.1 |
| 2.3 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.5 |
| 3.2 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 2.8 |
| 51.9% | Field goal % | 40.7% |
| 30.5% | Three-point % 1.8 vs 10.3 attempts | 36.8% |
| 69.1% | Free throw % | 89.9% |
| 56.9% | True shooting TS% | 54.6% |
| 25.9% | Usage USG% | 30.6% |
| 28.2% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 38.4% |
| 13.3% | Rebound % of available | 8.4% |
| +3.4 | Net rating on court | +9.1 |
| 14.2% | PIE player impact estimate | 13.4% |
| +2.8 | Plus-minus per game | +5.8 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveAlperen Sengun scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (20.4 vs 20.1), on Ball's heavier usage (30.6% vs 25.9%).
Sengun is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 56.9% to 54.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Ball (7.1 vs 6.2 assists), the glass to Sengun (8.9 vs 4.8 rebounds).
With Ball on the floor his team outscored opponents by +9.1 per 100 possessions, against +3.4 for Sengun; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Sengun — through —, Ball $40.8M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Sengun | Ball | |
|---|---|---|
| 46-26 | Record when playing | 41-31 |
| 19.8 | Points at home | 19.5 |
| 20.8 | Points on the road | 20.6 |
| 20.6 | Points in wins | 20.4 |
| 19.9 | Points in losses | 19.6 |
| 39 | Season high | 38 |
| 10 | 30-point games | 9 |
| 34 | Double-doubles | 10 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).