Brandon Miller vs Cade Cunningham

Cade Cunningham scored more in 2025-26, 3.7 points a game apart (23.9 vs 20.2), on Cunningham's heavier usage (29.6% vs 27.2%).

Miller is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.4% to 56.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Cunningham (9.9 vs 3.3 assists), the glass to Cunningham (5.5 vs 4.9 rebounds).

With Cunningham on the floor his team outscored opponents by +11.4 per 100 possessions, against +8.5 for Miller; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Miller $15.1M through 2026-27, Cunningham $50.1M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.