Clint Capela vs Hunter Dickinson
Capela · Dickinson
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveClint Capela scored more in 2025-26, 1.4 points a game apart (3.8 vs 2.4), on Dickinson's heavier usage (16.2% vs 13.3%).
Capela is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 54.0% to 40.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Capela (0.7 vs 0.4 assists), the glass to Capela (4.6 vs 1.0 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Capela played 70 more games (75 vs 5 of 82).
With Capela on the floor his team outscored opponents by +8.0 per 100 possessions, against -35.7 for Dickinson; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Capela $7.0M through 2027-28, Dickinson — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).