Collin Murray-Boyles vs Jake LaRavia
Murray-Boyles · LaRavia
Collin Murray-Boyles: Day-To-Day (Finger · Arm).
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveCollin Murray-Boyles scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (8.5 vs 8.2), on Murray-Boyles's heavier usage (15.0% vs 13.8%).
Murray-Boyles is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 62.1% to 57.1%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Murray-Boyles (1.9 vs 1.8 assists), the glass to Murray-Boyles (5.0 vs 4.0 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: LaRavia played 25 more games (82 vs 57 of 82).
With Murray-Boyles on the floor his team outscored opponents by +2.6 per 100 possessions, against 0.0 for LaRavia; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Murray-Boyles $6.6M through 2028-29, LaRavia $6.0M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).