Collin Sexton vs VJ Edgecombe
Sexton · Edgecombe
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveVJ Edgecombe scored more in 2025-26, 0.6 points a game apart (16.0 vs 15.4), on Sexton's heavier usage (24.8% vs 19.6%).
Sexton is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.5% to 54.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Edgecombe (4.2 vs 3.3 assists), the glass to Edgecombe (5.6 vs 2.3 rebounds).
With Edgecombe on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.9 per 100 possessions, against -3.0 for Sexton; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Sexton $9.4M through 2027-28, Edgecombe $11.7M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

