Deni Avdija vs Jaylen Brown
Avdija · Brown
| Avdija | Brown | |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | Games availability | 71 |
| 33.3 | Minutes per game | 34.4 |
| 24.2 | Points per game | 28.7 |
| 6.9 | Rebounds per game | 6.9 |
| 6.7 | Assists per game | 5.1 |
| 1.4 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.4 |
| 3.8 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 3.6 |
| 46.2% | Field goal % | 47.7% |
| 31.8% | Three-point % 6.0 vs 5.7 attempts | 34.7% |
| 80.2% | Free throw % | 79.5% |
| 60.0% | True shooting TS% | 57.3% |
| 28.5% | Usage USG% | 35.1% |
| 31.6% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 25.1% |
| 9.8% | Rebound % of available | 9.5% |
| +0.3 | Net rating on court | +6.5 |
| 14.9% | PIE player impact estimate | 15.2% |
| +0.2 | Plus-minus per game | +4.5 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJaylen Brown scored more in 2025-26, 4.5 points a game apart (28.7 vs 24.2), on Brown's heavier usage (35.1% vs 28.5%).
Avdija is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.0% to 57.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Avdija (6.7 vs 5.1 assists), the glass to Brown (6.9 vs 6.9 rebounds).
With Brown on the floor his team outscored opponents by +6.5 per 100 possessions, against +0.3 for Avdija; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Avdija $13.1M through 2027-28, Brown $57.1M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Avdija | Brown | |
|---|---|---|
| 35-31 | Record when playing | 47-24 |
| 25.2 | Points at home | 27.9 |
| 23.3 | Points on the road | 29.6 |
| 25.0 | Points in wins | 29.0 |
| 23.3 | Points in losses | 28.2 |
| 41 | Season high | 50 |
| 14 | 30-point games | 35 |
| 19 | Double-doubles | 14 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).