Desmond Bane vs Julius Randle
Bane · Randle
| Bane | Randle | |
|---|---|---|
| 82 | Games availability | 79 |
| 33.6 | Minutes per game | 33.0 |
| 20.1 | Points per game | 21.1 |
| 4.1 | Rebounds per game | 6.7 |
| 4.1 | Assists per game | 5.0 |
| 1.5 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.3 |
| 2.0 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 2.7 |
| 48.4% | Field goal % | 48.1% |
| 39.1% | Three-point % 5.2 vs 4.4 attempts | 31.5% |
| 90.8% | Free throw % | 80.2% |
| 60.7% | True shooting TS% | 58.5% |
| 22.4% | Usage USG% | 25.8% |
| 19.0% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 22.7% |
| 5.9% | Rebound % of available | 9.9% |
| +2.2 | Net rating on court | +4.0 |
| 11.1% | PIE player impact estimate | 12.8% |
| +1.6 | Plus-minus per game | +2.9 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJulius Randle scored more in 2025-26, 1.0 points a game apart (21.1 vs 20.1), on Randle's heavier usage (25.8% vs 22.4%).
Bane is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.7% to 58.5%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Randle (5.0 vs 4.1 assists), the glass to Randle (6.7 vs 4.1 rebounds).
With Randle on the floor his team outscored opponents by +4.0 per 100 possessions, against +2.2 for Bane; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Bane $39.4M through 2028-29, Randle $33.3M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Bane | Randle | |
|---|---|---|
| 45-37 | Record when playing | 47-32 |
| 21.4 | Points at home | 21.2 |
| 18.8 | Points on the road | 21.0 |
| 22.3 | Points in wins | 20.9 |
| 17.4 | Points in losses | 21.3 |
| 37 | Season high | 41 |
| 12 | 30-point games | 12 |
| 1 | Double-doubles | 15 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).