Devin Booker vs Julius Randle
Booker · Randle
| Booker | Randle | |
|---|---|---|
| 64 | Games availability | 79 |
| 33.5 | Minutes per game | 33.0 |
| 26.1 | Points per game | 21.1 |
| 3.9 | Rebounds per game | 6.7 |
| 6.0 | Assists per game | 5.0 |
| 1.1 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.3 |
| 3.1 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 2.7 |
| 45.6% | Field goal % | 48.1% |
| 33.0% | Three-point % 5.8 vs 4.4 attempts | 31.5% |
| 87.3% | Free throw % | 80.2% |
| 58.5% | True shooting TS% | 58.5% |
| 30.7% | Usage USG% | 25.8% |
| 29.3% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 22.7% |
| 5.5% | Rebound % of available | 9.9% |
| +3.9 | Net rating on court | +4.0 |
| 14.2% | PIE player impact estimate | 12.8% |
| +3.1 | Plus-minus per game | +2.9 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveDevin Booker scored more in 2025-26, 5.0 points a game apart (26.1 vs 21.1), on Booker's heavier usage (30.7% vs 25.8%).
Efficiency is a wash: true shooting within a point of each other (58.5% vs 58.5%).
Playmaking goes to Booker (6.0 vs 5.0 assists), the glass to Randle (6.7 vs 3.9 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Randle played 15 more games (79 vs 64 of 82).
With Randle on the floor his team outscored opponents by +4.0 per 100 possessions, against +3.9 for Booker; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Booker $57.1M through 2029-30, Randle $33.3M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Booker | Randle | |
|---|---|---|
| 37-27 | Record when playing | 47-32 |
| 25.8 | Points at home | 21.2 |
| 26.3 | Points on the road | 21.0 |
| 25.5 | Points in wins | 20.9 |
| 26.9 | Points in losses | 21.3 |
| 43 | Season high | 41 |
| 24 | 30-point games | 12 |
| 6 | Double-doubles | 15 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).