Dillon Brooks vs Pascal Siakam
Brooks · Siakam
| Brooks | Siakam | |
|---|---|---|
| 56 | Games availability | 62 |
| 30.4 | Minutes per game | 33.2 |
| 20.2 | Points per game | 24.0 |
| 3.6 | Rebounds per game | 6.6 |
| 1.8 | Assists per game | 3.8 |
| 1.2 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.5 |
| 1.8 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 2.2 |
| 43.5% | Field goal % | 48.4% |
| 34.4% | Three-point % 6.6 vs 4.7 attempts | 35.8% |
| 84.2% | Free throw % | 69.3% |
| 54.0% | True shooting TS% | 56.2% |
| 27.9% | Usage USG% | 29.2% |
| 9.5% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 19.0% |
| 5.8% | Rebound % of available | 9.5% |
| -1.1 | Net rating on court | -5.6 |
| 8.8% | PIE player impact estimate | 13.0% |
| -0.9 | Plus-minus per game | -3.7 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers abovePascal Siakam scored more in 2025-26, 3.8 points a game apart (24.0 vs 20.2), on Siakam's heavier usage (29.2% vs 27.9%).
Siakam is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 56.2% to 54.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Siakam (3.8 vs 1.8 assists), the glass to Siakam (6.6 vs 3.6 rebounds).
With Brooks on the floor his team outscored opponents by -1.1 per 100 possessions, against -5.6 for Siakam; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Brooks $20.0M through 2029-30, Siakam $48.9M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Brooks | Siakam | |
|---|---|---|
| 32-24 | Record when playing | 17-45 |
| 23.7 | Points at home | 22.9 |
| 16.9 | Points on the road | 25.0 |
| 20.4 | Points in wins | 25.5 |
| 19.9 | Points in losses | 23.4 |
| 40 | Season high | 37 |
| 4 | 30-point games | 14 |
| 0 | Double-doubles | 10 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).