Duncan Robinson vs Noah Clowney
Robinson · Clowney
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveNoah Clowney scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (12.3 vs 12.2), on Clowney's heavier usage (20.2% vs 15.2%).
Robinson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 62.9% to 55.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Robinson (2.1 vs 1.6 assists), the glass to Clowney (4.1 vs 2.7 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Robinson played 11 more games (77 vs 66 of 82).
With Robinson on the floor his team outscored opponents by +11.3 per 100 possessions, against -8.7 for Clowney; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Robinson $16.0M through 2027-28, Clowney $5.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

