Leonard Miller vs Paul Reed
Miller · Reed
Where the gap is
from the numbers abovePaul Reed scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (7.8 vs 7.8), on Reed's heavier usage (20.0% vs 17.6%).
Reed is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 65.0% to 63.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Reed (1.2 vs 0.9 assists), the glass to Reed (4.5 vs 3.9 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Reed played 19 more games (65 vs 46 of 82).
With Reed on the floor his team outscored opponents by +8.1 per 100 possessions, against -2.5 for Miller; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Miller $2.4M through 2026-27, Reed $5.6M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
