Adem Bona vs Jarred Vanderbilt

Adem Bona scored more in 2025-26, 0.4 points a game apart (4.8 vs 4.4), on Vanderbilt's heavier usage (11.9% vs 10.8%).

Bona is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 63.8% to 54.4%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Vanderbilt (1.3 vs 0.5 assists), the glass to Vanderbilt (4.5 vs 4.3 rebounds).

With Bona on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.3 per 100 possessions, against +0.2 for Vanderbilt; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Bona $2.3M through 2027-28, Vanderbilt $12.4M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.