Adem Bona vs Liam McNeeley

Adem Bona scored more in 2025-26, 0.5 points a game apart (4.8 vs 4.3), on McNeeley's heavier usage (14.4% vs 10.8%).

Bona is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 63.8% to 58.8%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to McNeeley (0.8 vs 0.5 assists), the glass to Bona (4.3 vs 2.4 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Bona played 40 more games (71 vs 31 of 82).

With McNeeley on the floor his team outscored opponents by +1.6 per 100 possessions, against +0.3 for Bona; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Bona $2.3M through 2027-28, McNeeley $2.9M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.