AJ Johnson vs Amir Coffey
Johnson · Coffey
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveAJ Johnson scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (3.3 vs 3.2), on Johnson's heavier usage (19.5% vs 11.7%).
Coffey is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 59.4% to 41.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Johnson (1.0 vs 0.6 assists), the glass to Coffey (1.2 vs 1.1 rebounds).
With Coffey on the floor his team outscored opponents by -2.2 per 100 possessions, against -6.4 for Johnson; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Johnson $3.2M through 2027-28, Coffey — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).