Bryce McGowens vs Nate Williams
McGowens · Williams
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveBryce McGowens scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (8.1 vs 8.0), on Williams's heavier usage (19.2% vs 13.6%).
McGowens is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 61.0% to 59.2%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to McGowens (1.5 vs 1.0 assists), the glass to Williams (2.1 vs 2.1 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: McGowens played 28 more games (42 vs 14 of 82).
With McGowens on the floor his team outscored opponents by -3.6 per 100 possessions, against -15.1 for Williams; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: McGowens $2.6M through 2027-28, Williams — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).