Cameron Johnson vs Jonathan Kuminga
Johnson · Kuminga
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJonathan Kuminga scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (12.2 vs 12.2), on Kuminga's heavier usage (22.6% vs 14.4%).
Johnson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 62.9% to 55.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Johnson (2.4 vs 2.3 assists), the glass to Kuminga (5.6 vs 3.8 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Johnson played 18 more games (54 vs 36 of 82).
With Johnson on the floor his team outscored opponents by +9.5 per 100 possessions, against +4.1 for Kuminga; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Johnson $23.1M through 2026-27, Kuminga $6.1M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

