Draymond Green vs Jake LaRavia
Green · LaRavia
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveDraymond Green scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (8.4 vs 8.2), on Green's heavier usage (15.8% vs 13.8%).
LaRavia is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 57.1% to 54.0%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Green (5.5 vs 1.8 assists), the glass to Green (5.5 vs 4.0 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: LaRavia played 14 more games (82 vs 68 of 82).
With LaRavia on the floor his team outscored opponents by 0.0 per 100 possessions, against -4.3 for Green; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Green $27.7M through 2026-27, LaRavia $6.0M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

