Drew Timme vs Taj Gibson
Timme · Gibson
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTaj Gibson scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (3.4 vs 3.4), on Timme's heavier usage (15.5% vs 12.3%).
Timme is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 65.8% to 57.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Timme (0.9 vs 0.6 assists), the glass to Gibson (2.7 vs 1.2 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Timme played 17 more games (27 vs 10 of 82).
With Gibson on the floor his team outscored opponents by -4.7 per 100 possessions, against -6.9 for Timme; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Timme — through —, Gibson $0.1M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).