Emanuel Miller vs Kevon Looney
Miller · Looney
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveEmanuel Miller scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (3.0 vs 2.8), on Miller's heavier usage (16.9% vs 9.6%).
Miller is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 54.0% to 45.8%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Looney (1.6 vs 0.8 assists), the glass to Looney (5.6 vs 0.6 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Looney played 16 more games (21 vs 5 of 82).
With Looney on the floor his team outscored opponents by -10.4 per 100 possessions, against -28.0 for Miller; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Miller — through —, Looney $2.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).