Jabari Walker vs Keshad Johnson
Walker · Johnson
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveKeshad Johnson scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (4.3 vs 4.3), on Johnson's heavier usage (17.1% vs 14.2%).
Johnson is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.2% to 56.8%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Walker (0.5 vs 0.3 assists), the glass to Walker (3.0 vs 1.9 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Walker played 32 more games (64 vs 32 of 82).
With Johnson on the floor his team outscored opponents by +13.0 per 100 possessions, against 0.0 for Walker; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Walker $2.6M through 2026-27, Johnson — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

