Jahmai Mashack vs Rob Dillingham
Mashack · Dillingham
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveRob Dillingham scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (6.3 vs 6.2), on Dillingham's heavier usage (21.8% vs 15.6%).
Dillingham is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 46.9% to 45.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Dillingham (2.2 vs 2.2 assists), the glass to Mashack (2.6 vs 2.0 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Dillingham played 34 more games (65 vs 31 of 82).
With Dillingham on the floor his team outscored opponents by -7.4 per 100 possessions, against -14.5 for Mashack; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Mashack — through —, Dillingham $6.9M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).