Jarace Walker vs Julian Champagnie
Walker · Champagnie
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJarace Walker scored more in 2025-26, 0.5 points a game apart (11.6 vs 11.1), on Walker's heavier usage (20.0% vs 14.6%).
Champagnie is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.9% to 54.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Walker (2.5 vs 1.5 assists), the glass to Champagnie (5.8 vs 5.1 rebounds).
With Champagnie on the floor his team outscored opponents by +12.4 per 100 possessions, against -11.1 for Walker; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Walker $8.5M through 2026-27, Champagnie $13.9M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

