Jonathan Kuminga vs Noah Clowney
Kuminga · Clowney
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveNoah Clowney scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (12.3 vs 12.2), on Kuminga's heavier usage (22.6% vs 20.2%).
Efficiency is a wash: true shooting within a point of each other (55.7% vs 55.4%).
Playmaking goes to Kuminga (2.3 vs 1.6 assists), the glass to Kuminga (5.6 vs 4.1 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Clowney played 30 more games (66 vs 36 of 82).
With Kuminga on the floor his team outscored opponents by +4.1 per 100 possessions, against -8.7 for Clowney; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Kuminga $6.1M through 2027-28, Clowney $5.4M through 2026-27. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).

