Jordan Goodwin vs Nique Clifford
Goodwin · Clifford
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJordan Goodwin scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (8.7 vs 8.6), on Clifford's heavier usage (16.7% vs 16.7%).
Goodwin is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 52.5% to 50.5%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Clifford (2.4 vs 2.2 assists), the glass to Goodwin (4.9 vs 3.8 rebounds).
With Goodwin on the floor his team outscored opponents by +3.3 per 100 possessions, against -4.5 for Clifford; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Goodwin $5.9M through 2028-29, Clifford $3.3M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
