Liam McNeeley vs Rasheer Fleming
McNeeley · Fleming
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveRasheer Fleming scored more in 2025-26, 0.0 points a game apart (4.3 vs 4.3), on Fleming's heavier usage (15.9% vs 14.4%).
McNeeley is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.8% to 51.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to McNeeley (0.8 vs 0.3 assists), the glass to McNeeley (2.4 vs 2.3 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Fleming played 24 more games (55 vs 31 of 82).
With Fleming on the floor his team outscored opponents by +6.1 per 100 possessions, against +1.6 for McNeeley; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: McNeeley $2.9M through 2028-29, Fleming $2.2M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).