Antonio Reeves vs Chaz Lanier

Antonio Reeves scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (2.7 vs 2.4), on Lanier's heavier usage (14.7% vs 13.3%).

Reeves is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 67.5% to 43.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Lanier (0.5 vs 0.3 assists), the glass to Reeves (0.8 vs 0.7 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Lanier played 24 more games (34 vs 10 of 82).

With Reeves on the floor his team outscored opponents by +19.7 per 100 possessions, against +2.0 for Lanier; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Reeves — through —, Lanier $2.2M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.