Caleb Martin vs Tristan Enaruna

Tristan Enaruna scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (4.1 vs 3.9), on Enaruna's heavier usage (16.0% vs 12.2%).

Enaruna is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.7% to 52.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.

Playmaking goes to Martin (1.4 vs 0.8 assists), the glass to Martin (2.5 vs 1.6 rebounds).

Availability is part of the comparison: Martin played 49 more games (58 vs 9 of 82).

With Enaruna on the floor his team outscored opponents by +21.7 per 100 possessions, against -9.2 for Martin; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.

On the books for 2026-27: Martin $10.0M through 2027-28, Enaruna — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.