Joan Beringer vs Tristan Enaruna
Beringer · Enaruna
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveTristan Enaruna scored more in 2025-26, 0.2 points a game apart (4.1 vs 3.9), on Enaruna's heavier usage (16.0% vs 15.6%).
Beringer is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 68.3% to 58.7%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Enaruna (0.8 vs 0.3 assists), the glass to Beringer (2.3 vs 1.6 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Beringer played 31 more games (40 vs 9 of 82).
With Enaruna on the floor his team outscored opponents by +21.7 per 100 possessions, against +2.3 for Beringer; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Beringer $4.4M through 2028-29, Enaruna — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).