Cason Wallace vs Justin Champagnie
Wallace · Champagnie
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJustin Champagnie scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (8.7 vs 8.6), on Champagnie's heavier usage (16.1% vs 14.1%).
Champagnie is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.9% to 53.8%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Wallace (2.6 vs 1.2 assists), the glass to Champagnie (5.6 vs 3.1 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Wallace played 8 more games (77 vs 69 of 82).
With Wallace on the floor his team outscored opponents by +12.4 per 100 possessions, against -9.4 for Champagnie; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Wallace $7.4M through 2026-27, Champagnie $2.7M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).