Justin Champagnie vs Nique Clifford
Champagnie · Clifford
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJustin Champagnie scored more in 2025-26, 0.1 points a game apart (8.7 vs 8.6), on Clifford's heavier usage (16.7% vs 16.1%).
Champagnie is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 58.9% to 50.5%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Clifford (2.4 vs 1.2 assists), the glass to Champagnie (5.6 vs 3.8 rebounds).
With Clifford on the floor his team outscored opponents by -4.5 per 100 possessions, against -9.4 for Champagnie; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Champagnie $2.7M through 2027-28, Clifford $3.3M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).