Chet Holmgren vs Evan Mobley
Holmgren · Mobley
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveEvan Mobley scored more in 2025-26, 1.1 points a game apart (18.2 vs 17.1), on Mobley's heavier usage (22.1% vs 21.4%).
Holmgren is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 65.3% to 59.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Mobley (3.6 vs 1.7 assists), the glass to Mobley (9.0 vs 8.9 rebounds).
With Holmgren on the floor his team outscored opponents by +16.1 per 100 possessions, against +5.7 for Mobley; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Holmgren $41.5M through 2030-31, Mobley $50.1M through 2029-30. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Holmgren | Mobley | |
|---|---|---|
| 56-13 | Record when playing | 40-25 |
| 17.1 | Points at home | 18.5 |
| 17.1 | Points on the road | 17.8 |
| 17.7 | Points in wins | 18.9 |
| 14.5 | Points in losses | 16.9 |
| 31 | Season high | 34 |
| 2 | 30-point games | 1 |
| 24 | Double-doubles | 27 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).