Chet Holmgren vs Jarrett Allen
Holmgren · Allen
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveChet Holmgren scored more in 2025-26, 1.7 points a game apart (17.1 vs 15.4), on Holmgren's heavier usage (21.4% vs 19.6%).
Allen is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 66.9% to 65.3%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Allen (1.8 vs 1.7 assists), the glass to Holmgren (8.9 vs 8.5 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Holmgren played 13 more games (69 vs 56 of 82).
With Holmgren on the floor his team outscored opponents by +16.1 per 100 possessions, against +6.4 for Allen; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Holmgren $41.5M through 2030-31, Allen $28.0M through 2028-29. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Holmgren | Allen | |
|---|---|---|
| 56-13 | Record when playing | 37-19 |
| 17.1 | Points at home | 13.4 |
| 17.1 | Points on the road | 16.9 |
| 17.7 | Points in wins | 16.9 |
| 14.5 | Points in losses | 12.3 |
| 31 | Season high | 40 |
| 2 | 30-point games | 2 |
| 24 | Double-doubles | 20 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).