Deni Avdija vs Paolo Banchero
Avdija · Banchero
| Avdija | Banchero | |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | Games availability | 72 |
| 33.3 | Minutes per game | 34.7 |
| 24.2 | Points per game | 22.2 |
| 6.9 | Rebounds per game | 8.4 |
| 6.7 | Assists per game | 5.2 |
| 1.4 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.3 |
| 3.8 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 3.1 |
| 46.2% | Field goal % | 45.9% |
| 31.8% | Three-point % 6.0 vs 3.8 attempts | 30.5% |
| 80.2% | Free throw % | 77.5% |
| 60.0% | True shooting TS% | 56.6% |
| 28.5% | Usage USG% | 27.4% |
| 31.6% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 23.5% |
| 9.8% | Rebound % of available | 11.9% |
| +0.3 | Net rating on court | -0.2 |
| 14.9% | PIE player impact estimate | 13.8% |
| +0.2 | Plus-minus per game | 0.0 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveDeni Avdija scored more in 2025-26, 2.0 points a game apart (24.2 vs 22.2), on Avdija's heavier usage (28.5% vs 27.4%).
Avdija is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.0% to 56.6%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Avdija (6.7 vs 5.2 assists), the glass to Banchero (8.4 vs 6.9 rebounds).
With Avdija on the floor his team outscored opponents by +0.3 per 100 possessions, against -0.2 for Banchero; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Avdija $13.1M through 2027-28, Banchero $41.5M through 2030-31. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Avdija | Banchero | |
|---|---|---|
| 35-31 | Record when playing | 38-34 |
| 25.2 | Points at home | 21.5 |
| 23.3 | Points on the road | 22.9 |
| 25.0 | Points in wins | 22.3 |
| 23.3 | Points in losses | 22.1 |
| 41 | Season high | 39 |
| 14 | 30-point games | 14 |
| 19 | Double-doubles | 26 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).