Paolo Banchero vs Pascal Siakam
Banchero · Siakam
| Banchero | Siakam | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Games availability | 62 |
| 34.7 | Minutes per game | 33.2 |
| 22.2 | Points per game | 24.0 |
| 8.4 | Rebounds per game | 6.6 |
| 5.2 | Assists per game | 3.8 |
| 1.3 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.5 |
| 3.1 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 2.2 |
| 45.9% | Field goal % | 48.4% |
| 30.5% | Three-point % 3.8 vs 4.7 attempts | 35.8% |
| 77.5% | Free throw % | 69.3% |
| 56.6% | True shooting TS% | 56.2% |
| 27.4% | Usage USG% | 29.2% |
| 23.5% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 19.0% |
| 11.9% | Rebound % of available | 9.5% |
| -0.2 | Net rating on court | -5.6 |
| 13.8% | PIE player impact estimate | 13.0% |
| 0.0 | Plus-minus per game | -3.7 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers abovePascal Siakam scored more in 2025-26, 1.8 points a game apart (24.0 vs 22.2), on Siakam's heavier usage (29.2% vs 27.4%).
Efficiency is a wash: true shooting within a point of each other (56.6% vs 56.2%).
Playmaking goes to Banchero (5.2 vs 3.8 assists), the glass to Banchero (8.4 vs 6.6 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Banchero played 10 more games (72 vs 62 of 82).
With Banchero on the floor his team outscored opponents by -0.2 per 100 possessions, against -5.6 for Siakam; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Banchero $41.5M through 2030-31, Siakam $48.9M through 2027-28. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Banchero | Siakam | |
|---|---|---|
| 38-34 | Record when playing | 17-45 |
| 21.5 | Points at home | 22.9 |
| 22.9 | Points on the road | 25.0 |
| 22.3 | Points in wins | 25.5 |
| 22.1 | Points in losses | 23.4 |
| 39 | Season high | 37 |
| 14 | 30-point games | 14 |
| 26 | Double-doubles | 10 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).