Julian Champagnie vs Tyler Burton
Champagnie · Burton
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveJulian Champagnie scored more in 2025-26, 0.3 points a game apart (11.1 vs 10.8), on Burton's heavier usage (18.0% vs 14.6%).
Champagnie is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 60.9% to 52.1%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Champagnie (1.5 vs 1.0 assists), the glass to Champagnie (5.8 vs 4.2 rebounds).
Availability is part of the comparison: Champagnie played 70 more games (82 vs 12 of 82).
With Champagnie on the floor his team outscored opponents by +12.4 per 100 possessions, against -22.3 for Burton; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
On the books for 2026-27: Champagnie $13.9M through 2028-29, Burton — through —. Whether either fits a trade is a Trade Machine question, not a stat one.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logsLast games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).
