Alperen Sengun vs Jalen Duren
Sengun · Duren
| Sengun | Duren | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Games availability | 70 |
| 33.3 | Minutes per game | 28.2 |
| 20.4 | Points per game | 19.5 |
| 8.9 | Rebounds per game | 10.5 |
| 6.2 | Assists per game | 2.0 |
| 2.3 | Steals + blocks per game | 1.6 |
| 3.2 | Turnovers per game · lower is better | 1.9 |
| 51.9% | Field goal % | 65.0% |
| 30.5% | Three-point % 1.8 vs 0.0 attempts | 0.0% |
| 69.1% | Free throw % | 74.7% |
| 56.9% | True shooting TS% | 68.8% |
| 25.9% | Usage USG% | 23.1% |
| 28.2% | Assist % of teammates' baskets | 10.4% |
| 13.3% | Rebound % of available | 18.2% |
| +3.4 | Net rating on court | +11.8 |
| 14.2% | PIE player impact estimate | 17.7% |
| +2.8 | Plus-minus per game | +6.9 |
Where the gap is
from the numbers aboveAlperen Sengun scored more in 2025-26, 0.9 points a game apart (20.4 vs 19.5), on Sengun's heavier usage (25.9% vs 23.1%).
Duren is the more efficient scorer by true shooting, 68.8% to 56.9%; TS% folds threes and free throws into one number, so the gap survives shot-diet differences.
Playmaking goes to Sengun (6.2 vs 2.0 assists), the glass to Duren (10.5 vs 8.9 rebounds).
With Duren on the floor his team outscored opponents by +11.8 per 100 possessions, against +3.4 for Sengun; on-court net rating carries the teammates with it, so read it next to PIE.
Splits
2025-26 · from the game logs| Sengun | Duren | |
|---|---|---|
| 46-26 | Record when playing | 50-20 |
| 19.8 | Points at home | 20.3 |
| 20.8 | Points on the road | 18.7 |
| 20.6 | Points in wins | 20.8 |
| 19.9 | Points in losses | 16.1 |
| 39 | Season high | 36 |
| 10 | 30-point games | 8 |
| 34 | Double-doubles | 41 |
Last games & contracts
test a trade in the Trade Machine →More comparisons
pick any two players →Per-game numbers and percentages are 2025-26 regular season from stats.nba.com; splits and last games from our own game logs; contract figures are cap hits from public salary data and can lag a signing by a day. Bold marks the better number in each row (turnovers: fewer is better).